Graffiti: Art or vandalism?
When people hear graffiti, many think of vandalism, but growing numbers of enthusiasts are calling it art. Rita explores graffiti in New York.
This article has been summarized and translated using AI to help you practice reading and comprehension. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances may be lost in translation.
Graffiti has long been controversial, traditionally seen as vandalism but increasingly recognized as legitimate art. The debate focuses on whether street art should be considered creative expression or criminal property damage. Museums and galleries now showcase graffiti, elevating it from underground street art to recognized artistic medium.
This reflects changing perceptions of graffiti's cultural and artistic value. Rita Braver's exploration highlights graffiti's artistic merit, showing that some pieces are carefully crafted visual art worth over $100,000.
Historically, graffiti emerged as urban expression in marginalized communities, where young artists used city walls as canvases. The artistic techniques are diverse and sophisticated, often incorporating social and political messages.
Critics argue graffiti damages property and creates urban decay impressions, while proponents emphasize its legitimacy as artistic expression rooted in urban culture. Some cities now embrace graffiti, creating designated spaces and commissioning murals. This transformation reflects broader cultural shifts toward accepting diverse artistic forms.