Why Startups Fail Without Political Communication
In early company phases, there's often a lack of time, resources or experience to establish strategic communication. Yet this is precisely where long-term relevance is determined.
This article has been summarized and translated using AI to help you practice reading and comprehension. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances may be lost in translation.
Strategic communication is frequently overlooked in early company stages due to limited time, resources, or experience. However, this is exactly when a company's long-term relevance is determined. The political landscape may seem like an exclusive club, but young companies shouldn't be discouraged.
Political communication has become a genuine competitive advantage, especially for innovation-driven sectors like energy. Strategic communication helps young companies position themselves, become distinguishable, and create relevance in competitive environments.
Harvard Business Review research demonstrates that image-building investments contribute to long-term profitability and economic stability. In political contexts, this means actively participating in regulatory debates and positioning oneself as a shaper rather than an observer. Effective political communication doesn't require massive resources.
Key strategies include clear messaging, strategic stakeholder mapping, and concise formats like position papers. In the energy sector, technological innovation alone is insufficient due to heavy regulation through laws and government programs. Political objectives directly influence markets and business decisions.
Many companies with promising solutions fail due to lack of political visibility. Strategic communication should be proactive, not reactive.
Companies that communicate boldly and engage early in political debates will be perceived as relevant actors, regardless of their size.
Original Article
deutsche-startups.dehttps://www.deutsche-startups.de/2025/10/03/warum-startups-ohne-politische-kommunikation-verlieren/